meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
discussion:suspended_license_court [2022/04/30 17:53] – Gene Hughdiscussion:suspended_license_court [2023/04/28 16:50] (current) – Gene Hugh
Line 8: Line 8:
 **Charges - upon further investigation**:\\ Did not stop at red light - petty offense\\ No Vehicle Insurance (__1st occurrence__) - petty offense (proof: [[http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=062500050K3-707|625 ILCS 5/3-707(c)]])\\ Suspended driver's license (__failure to pay parking fine__) - petty offense (proof: [[http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=062500050K6-303|625 ILCS 5/6-303(a-7)]] and [[http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/fulltext.asp?name=100-1004|Public Act 100-1004]] and [[http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/100/HB/10000HB3920.htm|HB3920]]) **Charges - upon further investigation**:\\ Did not stop at red light - petty offense\\ No Vehicle Insurance (__1st occurrence__) - petty offense (proof: [[http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=062500050K3-707|625 ILCS 5/3-707(c)]])\\ Suspended driver's license (__failure to pay parking fine__) - petty offense (proof: [[http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=062500050K6-303|625 ILCS 5/6-303(a-7)]] and [[http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/fulltext.asp?name=100-1004|Public Act 100-1004]] and [[http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/100/HB/10000HB3920.htm|HB3920]])
  
-**Bond:** Driver would have to be TVB'ed, since he has a suspended driver's license and also required bond for having no insurance (proof: [[http://directives.chicagopolice.org/directives/data/a7a57be2-12a9fb0e-d1912-aa0c-91c4eb0600275ea8.html?ownapi=1|S06-13, III-B-2]])+**Bond:** Driver would have to be TVB'ed, since he has a suspended driver's license and also required bond for having no insurance (proof: S06-13, III-B-2)
  
-**Mandatory Court:** Yes (proof: [[http://directives.chicagopolice.org/directives/data/a7a57be2-1298e665-08812-98fc-a11d1408559526dc.html|S04-14-03, II-F]])+**Mandatory Court:** Yes (proof: S04-14-03, II-F)
  
-**Traffic Court Assignment:** Minor Traffic Court (since all charges are petty) (proof: [[http://directives.chicagopolice.org/directives/data/a7a57be2-12a9fb0e-d1912-aa0c-91c4eb0600275ea8.html?ownapi=1|S06-13, III-B-2]])\\ This scenario would NOT be assigned to a Alternate Major Traffic Courtroom, since [[http://directives.chicagopolice.org/directives/data/a7a57be2-1298e665-08812-98f5-e370574d0b9e7078.html?hl=true|S04-14-02, V-D]], specifically states Alternate Major Room specifically sees "misdemeanor traffic offense", since charges are all petty, then it would be assigned to Minor Traffic Courtroom.+**Traffic Court Assignment:** Minor Traffic Court (since all charges are petty) (proof: S06-13, III-B-2)\\ This scenario would NOT be assigned to a Alternate Major Traffic Courtroom, since S04-14-02, V-D, specifically states Alternate Major Room specifically sees "misdemeanor traffic offense", since charges are all petty, then it would be assigned to Minor Traffic Courtroom.